Correction: Apple TV-show rentals not an inevitable success

You may not see the following correction in the Washington Post, so I am posting it here:

A Sept. 2, 2010 Style story about the release of ABC and Fox TV episodes for rent at 99 cents each on Apple’s revised Apple TV incorrectly assumed the success of the Cupertino, Calif., firm’s new video offering. Last week, Apple quietly removed that rental option from Apple TV and its iTunes Store.

Yes, I feel a little used after hyping that service in my story. But I wasn’t alone–analyst Michael Gartenberg, sitting next to me in the auditorium at the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts, told me that he thought all the other networks would sign up for Apple’s rentals by the holidays. And things could have been worse: That story was briefly a candidate for the front page before a space crunch in Financial resulting in it moving to Style.

Apple’s reversal–along with two other notable retreats last week, Facebook’s elimination of the Places mobile check-in feature that was supposed to kill Foursquare and the Deals Groupon clone that might have done the same to other daily-deal services–constitutes a useful reminder of the virtues of small-c conservatism in tech reporting. Not every new product or service will upend the world, no matter how incredible it looks in the demo or how big the company behind it; many of them will leave no trace beyond a Wikipedia entry.

3 thoughts on “Correction: Apple TV-show rentals not an inevitable success

  1. I can’t help but feel like everyone else has so much more money to spend than I do. I know that $.99 isn’t a lot of money, but it is more than I would pay for access to something that was otherwise free. I love my DVR, it records all of the shows that I like, even when I don’t know they are on. Combine that with On Demand, and it is even less worth the expense. I discovered a few shows last fall after the new season had begun and was able to go back and watch the first few episodes, On Demand. Now, if I could get away from paying the rental fee for the DVR, I would. I used to own my VCR, why can’t I do the same with the DVR.

    I think that all of the online services are still struggling with the expectation of getting internet content for free. Until all of the news and media outlets start to charge for access, it will be hard for just one or two to expect people to pay for access. There are plenty of choices on the Internet.

  2. Pingback: Roku: The Apple TV For The Rest Of Us? - I Tech Press

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.